Looking back through my running logs to research my past performances at this race I could see the slow, awful, efforts as I came back to running after a life threatening illness in 2004. My mileage in 2005 was in the 600 mile range and 2006 wasn't much better. 2007 saw me nearly hit 1,000 miles and I ran my first Senior Games 5K that year in 22:47.
I went into this particular race knowing that breaking 24:00 would be a tough nut to crack. The McMillan calculator showed that based on my 51 minute performance at 10K the week before, 24:33 would be the result. I ran 24:30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1018c/1018c9b2c48bac273abad90ea2d318c61b7334e4" alt=""
As one of my blog followers pointed out, weight loss is the only thing that's going to return my speed. 10 pounds would be worth a good 90 seconds off my 5K time. I've got a month before my next race. I plan to keep my mileage in the 30 to 40 range and add some intensity. I might even do some long intervals. I want to break 23 minutes by February. That's the goal at least.
Hi John, I would say 23 minutes is clearly in your sights. By the way, I liked your piece on Peter O'Toole, one my favourite actors and personnages. In a way, Peter O'Toole exemplified Neil Young's axiome, better to burn out than to rust. Kind regards, Mason
ReplyDelete